Úvahy dne, 8/1/25: Souhlasím s @FedGuy12. Odvážná Bowmanová správně vyvolala Pusillanimous Powella a nyní správně volá Parsimonious Powell. JPOW = mistr bruslení tam, kde byl puk
Michael Kao
Michael Kao31. 7. 2025
Na Bold Bowman se mi líbí, že není žádná sračka a říká to tak, jak to je, když se fakta změní. Volala po Pusillanimousovi Powellovi za jeho nevysvětlitelný předčasný obrat a nyní volá po úsporném Powellovi za jeho nově nalezenou neústupnost. Anti-Gretzky z předsedů Fedu se vám musí líbit: JPOW je mistrem bruslení tam, kde byl puk uložen...
@JohnCarey17 @FedGuy12 Trump má nyní obětního beránka a vsadím se, že je tajně šťastný. 😂
Michael Kao
Michael Kao22. 7. 2025
Musings of the Day, 7/21/25: One key lesson from Trump 1.0 is that he likes to keep folks guessing about his true intentions while maximizing optionality to maneuver. Case in point: A lot of folks are fretting over Trump’s noise over firing Powell, citing his increasingly aggressive rhetoric. In this case, I think the bluster is intentional with little/no intent to back it up. I see very low probability of this outcome, simply because he would be giving away optionality to maneuver — especially during ongoing Tariff negotiations. By vociferously castigating Powell (but not doing anything about it), Trump has set up the perfect Fall Guy if the economy takes a dump for ANY reason. The transition of Pusillanimous Powell to Parsimonious Powell creates a perfect scapegoat that allows him to be aggressive on Tariffs: Heads: the economy slows down, and Powell’s hand is forced anyway. Tails: Powell stays intransigent, and Trump has a free scapegoat option until 2026.
Vsadím se, že Trump je tajně šťastný z neústupnosti JPOW – dává mu to možnost obětního beránka.
Michael Kao
Michael Kao22. 7. 2025
Musings of the Day, 7/21/25: One key lesson from Trump 1.0 is that he likes to keep folks guessing about his true intentions while maximizing optionality to maneuver. Case in point: A lot of folks are fretting over Trump’s noise over firing Powell, citing his increasingly aggressive rhetoric. In this case, I think the bluster is intentional with little/no intent to back it up. I see very low probability of this outcome, simply because he would be giving away optionality to maneuver — especially during ongoing Tariff negotiations. By vociferously castigating Powell (but not doing anything about it), Trump has set up the perfect Fall Guy if the economy takes a dump for ANY reason. The transition of Pusillanimous Powell to Parsimonious Powell creates a perfect scapegoat that allows him to be aggressive on Tariffs: Heads: the economy slows down, and Powell’s hand is forced anyway. Tails: Powell stays intransigent, and Trump has a free scapegoat option until 2026.
A vsadím se, že Bessent je tajně šťastný z neústupnosti JPOW - pomůže mu to splatit náš dluh! 😂
41,53K